This exercise was made by AI and has not been reviewed by a person. How it is made

Reading Comprehension
Reading comprehension CEFR C1 Topic: Mycorrhizal fungal networks connecting forest trees

The Wood Wide Web: How Trees Talk Underground

What this tests: reading for detail, opinion, attitude, purpose and what the writer implies.

Exercise thumbnail

Instructions

Read the text and answer the six questions. Choose the option (A, B, C or D) that best fits according to the text.

For decades, foresters pictured trees as solitary competitors, locked in a silent struggle for light and soil. That picture has been overturned by a growing body of research into mycorrhizal fungi, the thread-like organisms that colonise root systems and, in doing so, stitch entire forests together into something resembling a single organism. It is this fungal web, rather than any direct contact between branches, that allows a towering Douglas fir to funnel surplus sugars to a shaded seedling several metres away, or a dying stump to be kept alive for decades by nutrients supplied through its neighbours' roots.

The ecologist whose work first brought this phenomenon to public attention, Suzanne Simard, spent years tracing the flow of carbon between trees using radioactive isotopes, and what she found was startling: older, better-connected trees - she called them "mother trees" - appeared to recognise their own offspring and divert resources towards them preferentially. Her findings, popularised in a bestselling memoir, inspired a wave of enthusiasm for the idea that forests are cooperative, even nurturing, communities rather than arenas of ruthless competition.

Not every scientist, however, is persuaded that the network deserves quite so romantic a reading. Critics point out that fungi are not charitable intermediaries but opportunists pursuing their own interests: a fungus that shuttles sugar from one tree to another may simply be following the path of least resistance, siphoning off whatever surplus is available rather than orchestrating any deliberate act of generosity. Nor is it clear how widespread or reliable such transfers are outside the particular forest types in which they have been studied. Some researchers worry that media coverage has run ahead of the evidence, turning a modest and still-contested finding into an unqualified parable of arboreal altruism.

What nobody seriously disputes is that the underground fungal network exists and that it moves water, carbon and warning signals - chemical alarms triggered by insect attack - between trees at a scale previously unimagined. Whether this amounts to communication in any meaningful sense, or merely to the passive by-product of a shared plumbing system, remains an open question. Either way, the discovery has already reshaped how foresters manage woodland, encouraging practices that preserve the oldest, most richly connected trees rather than simply replanting bare ground after logging.
1. According to the second paragraph, what did Suzanne Simard's isotope research suggest about older, well-connected trees?
2. What is implied in the third paragraph about the fungi's role in moving sugar between trees?
3. What is the writer's overall attitude towards the popular 'mother tree' narrative?
4. In the second paragraph, what does the phrase "this phenomenon" refer to?
5. Why does the writer introduce the critics' views in the third paragraph?
6. According to the final paragraph, what question remains genuinely unresolved?

Back to the exercise list

Share this exercise: Share on X Share on LinkedIn

🎬 Video walkthrough

This exercise read aloud, sentence by sentence: a pause to answer each question, the hint after the pause, then the answer and why. It gives the answers — try the exercise first.

14 min. All video walkthroughs